Re: Encoding Personal Use Ideographs

"James Kass" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.text.unicode.devel
Message-ID <002301c82022$7d7b0410$445cd942@yourus67pi6luv>
Kenneth Whistler wrote,

>> Meanwhile, what is the official position concerning ideographic
>> description sequences (and possible glyph generation from same) 
>> for representing unlikely-to-ever-be-encoded personal ideographs
>> in plain text?
> 
> There is no "official position". If you must have one, then
> I'd suggest submitting a proposal asking the UTC to go on
> record with an official position. Just be careful -- you
> might get what you are asking for: an "official position".

The concern is that an approach will be implemented and
publicized.  Five years down the road, a FAQ will appear
forbidding the practice.  This may seem a little far-fetched,
but stranger things have happened.

Best regards,

James Kass
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.