Re: Encoding Personal Use Ideographs
"James Kass" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.unicode.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <002301c82022$7d7b0410$445cd942@yourus67pi6luv> |
Kenneth Whistler wrote, >> Meanwhile, what is the official position concerning ideographic >> description sequences (and possible glyph generation from same) >> for representing unlikely-to-ever-be-encoded personal ideographs >> in plain text? > > There is no "official position". If you must have one, then > I'd suggest submitting a proposal asking the UTC to go on > record with an official position. Just be careful -- you > might get what you are asking for: an "official position". The concern is that an approach will be implemented and publicized. Five years down the road, a FAQ will appear forbidding the practice. This may seem a little far-fetched, but stranger things have happened. Best regards, James Kass