Re: Display of Mongolian in Arabic or Hebrew documents
"Andrew West" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.unicode.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 20/11/2007, Eric Muller <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Question: what is the practice (if any) when embedding a short > > fragment of Mongolian in Arabic or Hebrew text? In particular, if > > rotated 90 degrees, is it clockwise or counter clockwise? Supporting > > scans would be welcome. I don't know how Uyghur and Mongolian text are traditionally embedded within each other, as I have no pre-computer examples to go on. However, with a little help from google I have been able to find some discussion of this issue in Chinese, although it seems to be mostly descriptive of what various computer systems do rather than prescriptive of what they should do. For example, page 19 of this presentation (少数民族语言文字信息化) from 2005 shows various combinations of mixed Chinese, English, Tibetan, Mongolian and Uyghur text: <http://www.cmex.org.tw/cmex/documents/paper/CDF0304.pdf> Note that the examples in the top right corner show Mongolian, English, Chinese and Uyghur embedded in the same line within the context of a Uyghur (RTL) locale, but yet the Mongolian text reads LTR, just the same as it does in the Chinese (LTR) locale (as shown in the top left corner of the same page). From this it would seem that the evolving convention is to render Mongolian LTR when embedded in both LTR and RTL scripts. Andrew