Re: Display of Mongolian in Arabic or Hebrew documents

"Andrew West" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.text.unicode.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 21/11/2007, John Hudson <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> You mean for horizontal layout, don't you? In vertical layout, a vertically designed
> glyphs would be stacked, using something like the VORG table for heights to ensure proper
> connections.

I don't see how that would work. You could vertically stack short runs
of characters in the same way that you stack Tibetan vertically, but
how would it work for inmdeterminately long lines of text? The only
way I know of implementing vertical layout is for the rendering engine
to rotate a run of text 90 degrees (clockwise for text that runs LTR
horizontally, or counterclockwise for text that runs RTL
horizontally). From a font's perspective there is no difference
between horizontal layout and vertical (i.e. rotated horizontal)
layout.

Andrew
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.