CDP, was Re: Katakana Extended-A?

On Dec 3, 2007, at 1:16 PM, Kenneth Whistler wrote:

> However, it is known that there is another set of ideographic
> description symbols, separate from the GB set encoded in 2FF0..2FFF,
> so if the work to prepare a proposal for them ever gets completed,
> 2FE0..2FEF would be the most felicitous location for them to
> be encoded.


A proposal to encode CDP IDS operators was submitted some 5.5 years ago,

http://linguistics.berkeley.edu/~rscook/pdf/UniProp-Final/02221- 
n2480.pdf

but has been on the back burner ever since.

If I recall, it needs to be revised, either to make CDP syntax  
explicit (it is different from IDS), or else to suggest encoding  
these things as dingbats.