Re: Unicode 5.1, Egyptian Transliteration, and Fonts
Justin Kerk <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.unicode.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Saqqara wrote: > I used a test font on Windows XP (by far the most prevalent OS, currently, > with Egyptologists) to see if ligatures were applied by software with i/I > and U+0486, the results were: > > WordPad - yes, Notepad - yes, Microsoft Word - yes; WordPerfect - yes; > OpenOffice Writer 2.3 - NO. > > FireFox 2, Safari, Internet Explorer 7 - NO. > > For some reason the browsers (and OpenOffice) are not applying the ligature > defined in the (TrueType) font and one can conjecture that this may be due > to the Script value. Certainly until this is changed to 'Inherited' it would > not be totally unreasonable for software authors to limit combining/ligature > behaviour to Cyrillic. > > I hope developers of these applications subscribe to the list so perhaps we > can be informed on the rationale behind the current situation for OpenOffice > and the browsers. You might try testing with the beta version of Firefox 3 (http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all-beta.html), it has significant changes to the way text is handled and should take better advantage of Uniscribe's capabilities than 2.0 did. -Justin Kerk