Re: Unicode 5.1, Egyptian Transliteration, and Fonts

Justin Kerk <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.text.unicode.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Saqqara wrote:
> I used a test font on Windows XP (by far the most prevalent OS, currently,
> with Egyptologists) to see if ligatures were applied by software with i/I
> and U+0486, the results were:
> 
> WordPad - yes, Notepad - yes, Microsoft Word - yes; WordPerfect - yes;
> OpenOffice Writer 2.3 - NO.
> 
> FireFox 2, Safari, Internet Explorer 7 - NO.
> 
> For some reason the browsers (and OpenOffice) are not applying the ligature
> defined in the (TrueType) font and one can conjecture that this may be due
> to the Script value. Certainly until this is changed to 'Inherited' it would
> not be totally unreasonable for software authors to limit combining/ligature
> behaviour to Cyrillic.
> 
> I hope developers of these applications subscribe to the list so perhaps we
> can be informed on the rationale behind the current situation for OpenOffice
> and the browsers.

You might try testing with the beta version of Firefox 3 
(http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all-beta.html), it has significant 
changes to the way text is handled and should take better advantage of 
Uniscribe's capabilities than 2.0 did.

-Justin Kerk
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.