Re: Miscellaneous Mathematical Symbols-A

Kenneth Whistler <kenw at sybase dot com> wrote:

> I'd wager that *most* major implementers have already started to use 
> Unicode 5.1 code points in internal development of projected software 
> releases, and some of that is going to start leaking out publicly well 
> before the checkered flag on March 31.

I sure hope so.  I'm really tired of using "modern" software that claims 
conformance to Unicode 2.x or 3.x.

--
Doug Ewell  *  Fullerton, California, USA  *  RFC 4645  *  UTN #14
http://home.roadrunner.com/~dewell
http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html
http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages  ˆ

"Valid characters may be 8-bit ASCII, or ISO Latin-1 Unicode."
  -- constraints on sequential file names in Caché ObjectScript