RE: Questions regarding U+FD3E ORNATE LEFT PARENTHESIS and U+FD3F ORNATE RIGHT PARENTHESIS
Peter Constable <[email protected]> Sat, 8 Dec 2007 08:45:40 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.unicode.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <DDB6DE6E9D27DD478AE6D1BBBB83579561E5143269@NA-EXMSG-C117.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> |
> From: Kent Karlsson [mailto:[email protected]] > > I'm surprised you'd think that changing the > > mirroring property of these characters would be a good move. > > 1) These characters were relatively recently encoded in Unicode, > and there is likely not very many documents using the ornate > parentheses in a Unicode encoding. Furthermore, they are not > present in commonly used non-Unicode encodings. From DerivedAge.txt: FBD3..FD3F ; 1.1 # [365] ARABIC LETTER NG ISOLATED FORM..ORNATE RIGHT PARENTHESIS Do you really consider TUS1.1 to be relatively recent? Peter