RE: Dotless J with stroke.

 
John Hudson wrote:
> In this case, the people to take this up with would be the 
> International Phonetic 
> Association, since these are the people who a) reliably use a 
> form that resembles a barred 
> esh and b) call it 'Hooked barred dotless J'.

(I'm far from an IPA expert, but...)

There seems to be a logic to the name (and thus to how the glyph
SHOULD look) [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voiced_palatal_implosive]:

| Voiced palatal implosive
|
| ...dotless lowercase letter j with a horizontal stroke (the symbol
| for the voiced palatal plosive) and a rightward hook (the diacritic
| for implosives)...

So I would conclude that an esh-like or turned f-like glyph would just
be approximants, and not the intended glyph for any font. So please
make Latin small letter dotless j with stroke and hook look according
to its name (and definitely not with two strokes, misinterpreting the
serif on the j-part as a stroke, which I see in some fonts).

	/kent k

http://mudrac.ffzg.hr/~ltatomir/skripte/skripte/IPA_chart_2005.jpeg