Re: SVGDOMImplementation vs. 1.8?

Jess Holle <[email protected]> Fri, 27 Mar 2015 11:42:54 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.text.xml.batik.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
P.S. Thanks for the quick and effective help.

I would like to point out, however, that moving a public API between 
packages:

 1. Breaks binary compatibility and therefore should be avoided if at
    all possible (perhaps mashing the jars together would have been better)
 2. Should really be explicitly noted in the release notes to avoid such
    confusion

--
Jess Holle

On 3/27/2015 11:31 AM, Jess Holle wrote:
> We don't read SVGs from our users, /but/ most security folk just see a 
> security vulnerability and expect that a fixed version be used, period.
>
> They don't care that you'll never actually trigger it in your library 
> usage -- they don't bother mincing such fine details.
>
> On 3/27/2015 11:26 AM, Robert Marcano wrote:
>> On 03/27/2015 11:46 AM, Luis Bernardo wrote:
>>>
>>> ...
>> >
>>> Note that unless you need to use CMYK colors or you face some of few
>>> bugs that have been fixed since 1.7 there is no need to upgrade. Batik
>>> has been mostly inactive since 1.7 and the main developments in Batik
>>> (except for CMYK) are only likely to be noticeable if you use FOP.
>>
>> There is security vulnerability on 1.7 (CVE-2015-0250). Unless a 
>> 7.1.1 is released with the fix, a migration to 1.8 is a must if you 
>> read SVGs from users
>>
>>>
>>> On 3/27/15 4:51 PM, Jess Holle wrote:
>>>> Batik 1.8 seems to have removed the
>>>> org.apache.batik.dom.svg.SVGDOMImplementation class, whereas this
>>>> class is present in 1.7.
>>>>
>>>> Yet the Batik site itself provides examples using this class.
>>>>
>>>> So what's the story here?
>>>>
>>>> I ask as I am trying to move to Batik 1.8, but we have a class which
>>>> is using SVGDOMImplementation (for its SVG_NAMESPACE_URI constant and
>>>> its getDOMImplementation() method) and thus cannot currently move 
>>>> to 1.8.
>>>>
>>>> I am mystified as to how I am supposed to be able to move to 1.8 --
>>>> and why this API change is not clearly noted in the release notes.
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> Jess Holle
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: 
>>>> [email protected]
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: 
>>> [email protected]
>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>
>>
>