Re: [DISCUSS] Retiring 3.0 ? (Was: Re: Future of the Cocoon project)

On 2023/12/01 17:45:42 Francesco Chicchiricc=C3=B2 wrote:
> On 01/12/23 18:24, C=C3=A9dric Damioli wrote:
> > Le 01/12/2023 =C3=A0 17:41, C=C3=A9dric Damioli a =C3=A9crit=C2=A0:
> >> We'd like to know whether you'd prefer:
> >> [ ] retiring Cocoon 3.0
> >> [ ] reviving/maintaining Cocoon 3.0, meaning that you volunteer to be so=
mehow involved
> >
> > I'd vote +1 for retiring Cocoon 3.0, as during the past 10+ years, I had =
seen no thread, no questions about it.
> > I personally have never tried it.=20
>=20
> Cocoon 3.0 has been my first "serious" approach to The ASF and also where I=
 earned committership and PMC membership.
>=20
> I am not pleased to admin that, but I think it is time to let it go: while =
its ground ideas were incredibly neat at the time, they never turned into mai=
nstream, regrettably.
>=20
> It has been even used by Syncope until 3.0.0-M0 [1] around Q4 2022.

Also found [2] from my archives, at a cross site with the old Hippo CMS...

> Regards.
>=20
> [1] https://github.com/apache/syncope/blob/syncope-3.0.0-M0/pom.xml#L1167-L=
1176
[2] https://hct.tirasa.net/
> --=20
> Francesco Chicchiricc=C3=B2
>=20
> Tirasa - Open Source Excellence
> http://www.tirasa.net/
>=20
> Member at The Apache Software Foundation
> Syncope, Cocoon, Olingo, CXF, OpenJPA, PonyMail
> http://home.apache.org/~ilgrosso/
>=20
>=20