Re: new cocoon video tutorial available
Ken Starks <[email protected]> Mon, 18 Aug 2008 14:01:43 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.cocoon.documentation |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
hussayn wrote: > Hi, thanks for your so quick and positive response. I think, the creative > team at machinimatrix will > be eager to do some more stuff, including some really neat 3D visualizations > of a cocoon pipeline. > > Ken Starks wrote: > >> Pity you couldn't find a real female, though, or is the >> constituency of cocoon users still completely unbalanced in the male & >> female sense ? - Using an avatar as "moderator" was part of the design >> decision, when we made the concept for the tutorial. The main point here >> is, that our tutorials are created in a 3D environment, which probably >> will be "publicly visitable" at some time in the near future (plans are >> made, but decisions need to be taken yet) >> > > - Using a generated voice has 2 reasons: > > 1.) We thought, Avatars need computer voices (never break the media ;-) ) > 2.) The content is expressed in XML, so it is no problem to edit the text > during content creation and of course it is no problem to create a > transcription. > > Having said this, I think, we are going to add cocoon to our future video > production chain . > > regards, hussayn > This is excellent news. If Cocoon is seen to be _the_ Killer application that allows your creative people to be creative, without the technology getting in the way, who can possibly deny that it is awesome. I certainly don't really object to an avatar, and even if you were to employ a professional to do a performance, or just a voice-over, the avatar edition could provide an accurate reference to synchronise with, at a later editing stage.