| Newsgroups |
gmane.text.xml.cocoon.user |
| Message-ID |
<[email protected]> |
New question:
"A successful action will return the number of rows affected in a
sitemap parameter named row-count."
How to get that parameter in Java. I tried this, nothing.
String rowcount = parameters.getParameter("row-count", null);
Do I have to set it somehow in sitemap like with map:parameter?
- mika -
On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 21:58:19 +0200, Mika M Lehtonen
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Answering to my own question,
> Q: "I was just wondering, how would I get some sort of a callback
> from e.g. insert/update action in order to tell the user that his/her
> data is saved?"
> A: "A successful action will return the number of rows affected in a
> sitemap parameter named row-count."
>
> - mika -
>
> 15.11.2012 2:37, gelo1234 kirjoitti:
>
> 3) I agree, XSP was very flexible and I do miss it in 2.2/3.x
> Cocoon. I wonder what kind of limits did you find in XSP ?
> Its pretty straightforward and very general in nature - you can put
> any kind of Java and mix&match with XML.
> Its auto-compiled into Java classes so you don't have to "redeploy"
> anything, while making quick change to the system.
> It saves us a hell lot of time. Yet, you do have a full insight into
> Java class source that was auto-generated from .xsp file.
> Cocoon assists you with exact line number of problematic code while
> debugging.
> You also have full cache support of XSP files and thus blazingly
> fast responses!
> I find only advantages and no limits actually, notwithstanding the
> model/view/controller "code blending", but its a kind
> of convention that you follow.
>
> What I dislike in the recent versions of Cocoon is its strict
> adherence to Spring framework and/or ORM/Hibernate. If you only use
> XML
> as native data format and only need native SQL transactions, why
> should you need any ORM ? ORM creates additional overhead
> in the system, another layer of "mapping" between your business
> logic and DB, another "impedance mismatch".
> If you really care about the performance, you need to consider very
> carefully your persistence logic.
> IMHO, we ought to have the option to use only those parts of API
> that we actually need.
>
> Greetings,
> Greg
>
> 2012/11/14 Mika M Lehtonen
> Hi,
> I am using ye old modular database actions which in my opinion is
> extremely handy "tool".
>
> I was just wondering, how would I get some sort of a callback from
> e.g. insert/update action in order to tell the user that his/her data
> is saved?
>
> cheers,
> - mika -
>
> P.S. My two cents for the discussion, "Is Cocoon dead?". I have
> build quite a large application with C2.1. I wanted to see, feel what
> it is like to use database actions, XSP, CForms and so on. This is
> what I observed.
> 1) First of all. Developing an app without some sort of an IDE is
> pain in the ass. Debugging is almost impossible. No help with your
> "code". No nothing.
> 2) Modular database actions is something like I said, I like.
> 3) XSP is super to some stage. I really like it, if taking its
> restrictions into account. Say anything, I still like it.
> 4) CForms is a piece of shit hide behind nice curtains. Yeah, I know
> this is harsh to say. Still, it is something I banged my head against
> the wall all the time.
> 5) Jxtemplate and its relatives is hieroglyphic jargon. I wouldn't
> recommended them to anyone.
> 6) Flowscript. I never realized why.
>
> But the big question. How to do this all with C3. It's another kind
> of framework? Don't even try to do this?
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] [2]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] [3]
>
>
>
> Links:
> ------
> [1] mailto:[email protected]
> [2] mailto:[email protected]
> [3] mailto:[email protected]