Re: from Cforms to Wicket

Yeah,
I know what you mean. Most of the Xforms sites are dated back to 2002 or 
2003.. Sounds like a standard having glorious future behind..

This betterForm still sounded proper for my purposes because it actually 
implements server-side approache of Xforms. So I could use Xforms 
definition for producing HTML-forms, if I understood right. It actually 
resembles a lot of Cforms with a difference that it seems to be under 
development taking contemporary challenges into account.

But would I still need C3 (or C2.11 / C2.2)?

I would like to get familiar with C3 if I only could figure out how to 
start.

The biggest problem with C2.11, IMHO, was not having proper development 
tools to use. I ended up writing files with Notepad++. And I never 
realized how to do debugging..


- mika -


18.2.2013 10:48, Francesco Chicchiriccò kirjoitti:
> On 17/02/2013 21:57, Mika M Lehtonen wrote:
>> How about some XForms implementation like this http://www.betterform.de?
>> Sounds promising..
>
> I personally wouldn't bet much on XForms...
>
> Regards.
>