Re: from Cforms to Wicket

IMHO, any kind of *Forms* technology is not a viable solution today in the
long term. I wouldn't bet on XForms or any other non-standard/standard
framework/technology as long as you just don't want to play around with it.

The only valid standard today for View part of MVC/MVVP is ... HTML5.

Even Oracle found it right, by introducing HTML5 native tags that are
JSF-compatible (in JSF 2.2), not the JSF-only tags (as in JSF 2.1).

All big players: Oracle, IBM, Microsoft, Adobe have switched their
development
efforts to HTML5.

Greetings,
Greg





2013/2/18 Mika M Lehtonen <[email protected]>

> Yeah,
> I know what you mean. Most of the Xforms sites are dated back to 2002 or
> 2003.. Sounds like a standard having glorious future behind..
>
> This betterForm still sounded proper for my purposes because it actually
> implements server-side approache of Xforms. So I could use Xforms
> definition for producing HTML-forms, if I understood right. It actually
> resembles a lot of Cforms with a difference that it seems to be under
> development taking contemporary challenges into account.
>
> But would I still need C3 (or C2.11 / C2.2)?
>
> I would like to get familiar with C3 if I only could figure out how to
> start.
>
> The biggest problem with C2.11, IMHO, was not having proper development
> tools to use. I ended up writing files with Notepad++. And I never realized
> how to do debugging..
>
>
> - mika -
>
>
> 18.2.2013 10:48, Francesco Chicchiriccò kirjoitti:
>
>  On 17/02/2013 21:57, Mika M Lehtonen wrote:
>>
>>> How about some XForms implementation like this http://www.betterform.de?
>>> Sounds promising..
>>>
>>
>> I personally wouldn't bet much on XForms...
>>
>> Regards.
>>
>>
>
> ------------------------------**------------------------------**---------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@cocoon.**apache.org<[email protected]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>