Re: from Cforms to Wicket

Yep,
but as I started this chain, I stated that my problem is to "convert" my 
own defined dynamic XML into HTML4 (or HTML5) forms. I was looking 
something to replace Cforms (not just plain XSLT). I am also considering 
to move to C3 because as I stated earlier, developing without tools is 
hard. If I could take e.g. NetBeans and continue with that, I would be 
better off in the long run.

I was considering Apache Wickets because some integration has been done 
with C3, but right now it doesn't seem to be a real option.

HTML5 is still hype from my point of view.


- mika -


18.2.2013 15:50, gelo1234 kirjoitti:
> HTML5 in its basics is a superset of HTML4. If you don't use 
> HTML5-specific tags/spec you go well with old good HTML4.
>
> The original issue was NOT whether to use HTML5 or old HTML, but 
> whether to use CForms or just raw XHTML/HTML (4 or 5) forms.
>
> If you like to have HTML5 goodies in browsers that support it, just 
> use e.g. Cocoon Actions in Sitemap OR Advanced Sitemap Matchers OR in 
> REST-Controller by inspecting HTTP Headers return different Page that 
> generate a different Content (with XSLT) for IE8.
>
> Greetings,
> -Greg
>
>
> 2013/2/18 Mika M Lehtonen <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>>
>
>     Also HTML5 support for IE seems to be weak, even for IE9. There
>     are still lot of people using IE8 or even older browser + lot of
>     people in some sort of governmental offices using their own versions..
>     We can't sell apps without IE-support, absolutely no way.
>
>     http://people.mozilla.com/~prouget/ie9/
>     <http://people.mozilla.com/%7Eprouget/ie9/>
>
>     - mika -
>
>
>     18.2.2013 14:45, Robby Pelssers kirjoitti:
>
>         The only thing I wonder about is...
>
>         Cocoon and neither XSLT2.0 support html5 serialization for all
>         I know.  So does someone using Cocoon already generate HTML5
>         content with Cocoon and how did you accomplish this.
>
>         Cheers,
>         Robby
>
>         -----Original Message-----
>         From: Mika M Lehtonen [mailto:[email protected]
>         <mailto:[email protected]>]
>         Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 1:42 PM
>         To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>         Subject: Re: from Cforms to Wicket
>
>         Ok,
>         thanks for your efforts. HTML5 it is, with or without C3.
>
>         - mika -
>
>
>         18.2.2013 14:25, Francesco Chicchiriccò kirjoitti:
>
>             On 18/02/2013 13:09, Mika M Lehtonen wrote:
>
>                 Yeah,
>                 I know what you mean. Most of the Xforms sites are
>                 dated back to 2002
>                 or 2003.. Sounds like a standard having glorious
>                 future behind..
>
>                 This betterForm still sounded proper for my purposes
>                 because it
>                 actually implements server-side approache of Xforms.
>                 So I could use
>                 Xforms definition for producing HTML-forms, if I
>                 understood right. It
>                 actually resembles a lot of Cforms with a difference
>                 that it seems to
>                 be under development taking contemporary challenges
>                 into account.
>
>             "under development" with latest release 4.1 dating 1 year
>             back [1]
>
>                 But would I still need C3 (or C2.11 / C2.2)?
>
>             It depends on you, and on how much effort do you want to
>             put on this
>             task.
>             Anyway, not necessarily, even though Cocoon will help in
>             you in the
>             XML side if the job.
>
>                 I would like to get familiar with C3 if I only could
>                 figure out how
>                 to start.
>
>                 The biggest problem with C2.11, IMHO, was not having
>                 proper
>                 development tools to use. I ended up writing files
>                 with Notepad++.
>                 And I never realized how to do debugging..
>
>             [1] http://sourceforge.net/projects/betterform/files/
>
>                 18.2.2013 10:48, Francesco Chicchiriccò kirjoitti:
>
>                     On 17/02/2013 21:57, Mika M Lehtonen wrote:
>
>                         How about some XForms implementation like this
>                         http://www.betterform.de?
>                         Sounds promising..
>
>                     I personally wouldn't bet much on XForms...
>
>                     Regards.
>
>
>         ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>         To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>         <mailto:[email protected]>
>         For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>         <mailto:[email protected]>
>
>
>
>
>         ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>         To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>         <mailto:[email protected]>
>         For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>         <mailto:[email protected]>
>
>
>
>     ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>     To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>
>     For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>
>
>