Re: org.xml.sax.helpers.DefaultHandler in xml-commons/JAXP

Ville Skyttä <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.text.xml.commons.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Thanks for the clarification, Shane.  Some comments below.

On Tue, 2003-10-21 at 22:11, [email protected] wrote:

> In principle I'd say we'll be shipping the version that matches the 
> current JAXP 1.2 TCK, since we need to pass the TCK to have an official 
> release.

Makes sense.

>   Unfortunately this sometimes means shipping potentially 
> confusing code for those who are already expecting the latest-and-greatest 
> of all their components.

Hm, regarding this particular change, the people who are most likely to
get bitten are folks still using a < 1.4 J2SE and xml-commons-apis
1.0b2, kind of not ones who already expect the latest and greatest IMHO
:)

xml-commons-apis 1.0b2 is (sf.net) SAX 2 compatible, but incompatible
with /all/ JAXP versions wrt. this tiny bit (IIRC).  And Xerces and
friends who ship SAX APIs have since long shipped JAXP (ie. not SAX)
compatible versions.

The next version of xml-commons-apis seems to turn this around, leaving
sf.net SAX alone "incompatible" with other Java packages including SAX
APIs.

> Does that help at all?

Yes, thanks.

>   I'm too tired today to completely parse the 
> message, but does anyone believe that we still have SAX code that does not 
> match the JAXP 1.2 TCK?  If so, we need to fix it.

I don't know about this.

>   If we have code that 
> does not match sourceforge SAX release, well, then, that's too bad for 
> now.

This is what I was asking.  I think adding a note about this in the
release notes would not be a bad idea, especially because it is also an
incompatibility between xml-commons-apis 1.0b2 and $nextversion.

Cheers, \/ille
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.