Re: Future of xml-commons-resolver development and maintenance

Michael Glavassevich wrote:
> Earl Hood wrote:
> >
> > The revision number is bogus since it is based on the svn revision
> > of the repo I imported that 1.2 source release.
> >
> > The diffs are against the released 1.2 source.  If required,
> > I can see if the diffs need to be redone against the trunk,
> > assuming there are changes in the trunk from 1.2.
>
> No changes have been made to the resolver code since the 1.2 release.

Thanks for clarifying. The diffs that i have tried are okay.
I will comment via BugZilla if needed.

-David