Re: xml-apis.jar TCK testing and versioning?

"Antonio Gallardo" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.text.xml.commons.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Shane Curcuru dijo:
> Anyone worked on getting a proven-TCK-passing version of our xml-apis
> component so we can have a official versioned release of this that other
>  projects can incorporate?
>
> Lacking that (I don't have the JAXP TCK setup myself), we should
> recommend  that other projects should just take the xml-apis.jar that's
> bundled with  either the Xalan or Xerces release they're using.  I'm
> thinking of the  upcoming Ant 1.6 here.
>
> Oh: in terms of an xml-apis component version number, my best idea is a
> multipart number based on the JAXP version number - since that's
> primarily  what xml-apis supports.  And we should try to count any
> previous
> Xerces/Xalan releases as well, so our next likely xml-apis release would
> be  called 1.2.03 or something like that (1.2 since the branch we should
> use  supports the JAXP 1.2 TCK, and 03 since Xerces/Xalan have already
> shipped a  couple? of versions previously).  Comments or other ideas?

+1 It would be a good start. Pleae keep in mind than sometimes less is
more than nothing at all.

Best Regards,

Antonio Gallardo
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.