Re: xml-apis.jar TCK testing and versioning?

"Antonio Gallardo" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.text.xml.commons.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Sarah McNamara dijo:
>
>
>
>
>> Anyone worked on getting a proven-TCK-passing
>> version of our xml-apis
> The version in xml-commons tagged with Xerces-J_2_4_0 is a
> proven-TCK-passing version of xml-apis.  The xml-apis.jar
> corresponding to those tags can be taken from
> xml-xerces/java/tools/xml-apis.jar (use tagged version
> Xerces-J_2_4_0 of this just to be sure).
>
> How about we put together a package that
> represents this version and post it to the downloads
> for xml-commons.  Since this was the original
> tck compliant version for JAXP 1.2, we could
> call the packages:
>    xml-apis-jaxptck1.2.zip
>    xml-apis-jaxptck1.2.tar.gz
>
> Moving forward we want to publish from the latest in the
> tck-jaxp-1_2_0 branch which contains the SAX 2.0.1
> updates. This is also a proven-TCK-passing version
> of xml-apis.   We would need to build an official binary for
> this as none exists yet.  Before doing the package we
> can update the Version.java file and manifest file
> to reflect the version number of this build.
>
> So, we could publish a second package,
>    xml-apis-jaxptck1.2.01.zip
>    xml-apis-jaxptck1.2.01.tar.gz
>
> Sound good?

Yep. Just a question. It is really important to "print" in the name of the
jar the "jaxptck" label?

I could be just:

    xml-apis-1.2.01.zip
    xml-apis-1.2.01.tar.gz

What you think?

Best Regards,

Antonio Gallardo
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.