Re: Releasing transports 1.0 - dependency resolutions
"Asankha C. Perera" <[email protected]> Tue, 31 Mar 2009 11:23:34 +0530
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.axis.devel,gmane.text.xml.commons.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Jarek Gawor wrote: > On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 12:22 AM, Asankha C. Perera <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> 2) Move the base, local, tcp, and http transport modules back to Axis2 >>>> and release them with Axis2. That way the transports project would >>>> only have the 'optional' transport modules and we wouldn't have to >>>> release the transports for/with Axis2. >>>> >> You can take back just http and local into Axis2 if that makes the release >> possible, but not base. AFAIK the base had no relationship with the Axis2 >> http transport. I do not think the tcp transport has much value to vanilla >> Axis2 either.. >> > > Transport base has lots of dependencies on Axis2 and transport http > has dependencies on transport base (and Axis2). So transport base has > to move if we decide to move it. No, only the following two classes are using a two utility classes, which can be fixed easily. Like I said, the base will remain in the transports module - whether it be under commons or back again in Synapse. ./src/org/apache/axis2/transport/http/CommonsHTTPTransportSender.java ./src/org/apache/axis2/transport/http/AxisServlet.java > I mentioned tcp and local transport modules because they are currently enabled in Axis2 conf.xml file so > we would need to update the configuration at least. > thats fine cheers asankha -- Asankha C. Perera AdroitLogic, http://adroitlogic.org http://esbmagic.blogspot.com