Re: Donation of JAXP 1.3 Sources to Apache
Berin Lautenbach <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.general,gmane.text.xml.xerces-j.devel,gmane.text.xml.xalan.devel,gmane.text.xml.commons.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Neeraj Bajaj wrote: > Hello All, > > I was wondering when can we start merging the JAXP 1.3 sources ? Merging > the code in branch/review/testing/committing to main trunk > would take time so at least from my side i would like to see this work > started as early as possible say from tomorrow. What is the general > procedure ? Is there any formality that needs to be completed first ? > What is the opinion of > (Xml-commons/Xerces/Xalan) committers ? I'm assuming that this is something that XML-Commons/Xerces/Xalan wish to do? I've CCd general@incubator as well, as I'd like Noel's opinion, but my feeling is that *if* the Xerces/Xalan and/or XML-Commons community want this code to be imported (and it sounds like they do - but I'd like to see that formalised), then the community side is already there. If that's the case, then I don't think we need to go through the full incubation process (Noel - thoughts appreciated!) - we only need a code grant from Sun (we can't take something into our repository until we are sure we have appropriate legal rights to do so) + someone needs to fill out the incubation docs to show that everything is AOK. I'm happy to help out with the latter part. Code grant details can be found at : http://www.apache.org/licenses/#grants > > As the sources would be put in a branch so it won't affect normal > development but it would be good if we can restrict > large chunk of changes to the main trunk and fix only critical changes. > It would help merging the changes back to main > trunk. What do others think ? > > Thanks, > Neeraj > > > Neeraj Bajaj wrote: > >> >> >> Ramesh Mandava wrote: >> >>>> >>>> >>>> - Both Elliotte's and Clay's questions below are important. If someone >>>> familiar with the code could comment on: For either the main trunk, or >>>> a temporary working branch for integration: >>>> >>>> -- What JVM's will this code compile on? Version/Vendors? >>>> >>> J2SE 1.4.x, J2SE 5.0 . We tried this on Sun JDKs but the same >>> sources should run on other JVMs as well. >>> >>>> >>>> -- What JVM's will this code run on? Version/Vendors? >>>> >>> >>> J2SE 1.3.x, J2SE 1.4.x, J2SE 5.0. Again we qualified the sources on >>> Sun JVM. But as there is no Sun JVM specific codem these sources >>> should work on other JVMs without modification ( we have to try it >>> out though :-) ). >> >> >> >> Right. This hasn't been tried but i don't see any reason why it >> shouldn't work on any other JVM as there isn't any Sun JVM specific code. >> >> In other mail i have suggested that active Xerces/Xalan committers can >> try this before committin on main truck as the plan is to put the code >> on branch first. I proposed JAXP 1.3 APIs to be committed on >> xml-commons main trunk but i am totally fine with creating a branch >> first to test >> the compatibility with other JVM. >> >> Neeraj >> >>> >>> >>>> >>>> We need to *clearly* document which versions this stuff works on, and >>>> should conditionally compile or something if it won't compile on at >>>> least 1.3 >>> >>> >>> >>> Right now we face compilation problems in couple of file with J2SE >>> 1.3, but these should be worked around though. We can atleast have a >>> switch to achieve the requirement of compiling on J2SE 1.3. >>> >>>> (since we still have a lot of older JDK version users here). >>>> >>>> My knee-jerk reaction is also to hope that it will compile & run on >>>> both recent Sun and IBM JVMs at least before we put this on the main >>>> trunk: we should really try to be JVM-vendor agnostic. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> I agree. >>> >>> Regards >>> -Ramesh >>> >>>> (anyone still >>>> working on kaffe? 8-) >>>> >>> >>> >>>> >>>> --- Clay Leeds <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Oct 12, 2004, at 5:12 AM, Elliotte Harold wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Are these APIs and implementation thereof independent of Java 1.5? >>>>>> i.e. can they be compiled and used in a Java 1.2/1.3/1.4 >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> environment? >>>>> >>>>>> If not, could they be backported to work in such environments? >>>>>> >>>>>> -- Elliotte Rusty Harold [email protected] >>>>>> XML in a Nutshell 3rd Edition Just Published! >>>>>> http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xian3/ >>>>>> http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0596007647/cafeaulaitA/ >>>>>> ref%3Dnosim >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Forgive me if this is covered under Mr. Harold's question, but: >>>>> >>>>> Would this also be portable to IBM Java 1.30 (and any other >>>>> non-Sun implementation of Java...)? >>>>> >>>>> Web Maestro Clay >>>>> >>>>> p.s. I'm not trying to look a gift-horse in the mouth--Thank you >>>>> Sun! Love your logo! >>>>> -- >>>>> Clay Leeds - <[email protected]> >>>>> Webmaster/Developer - Medata, Inc. - <http://www.medata.com/> >>>>> PGP Public Key: <https://mail.medata.com/pgp/cleeds.asc> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ===== >>>> - Shane >>>> >>>> <eof .sig="http://apachecon.com/ November in Vegas, baby!" /> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > >