Re: XmlSchema/Axiom/Policy

Lawrence Mandel <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.apache.webservices.general,gmane.text.xml.axis.devel,gmane.text.xml.commons.devel
Message-ID <OFD2570CAE.D83A7524-ON8525710D.005AF647-8525710D.005B8748@ca.ibm.com>
John Kaputin and I have found a few problems in XmlSchema while developing 
Woden [1]. We've fixed some but do have some outstanding issues such as 
adding a URI resolver framework and clearly defining an XmlSchema API 
capable of both reading and writing schemas. I'd be in favour of creating 
a 1.0 release plan with goals to resolve some of the major issues adopter 
projects such as Woden have as opposed to just declaring the current state 
as 1.0. 

Lawrence Mandel

[1] http://incubator.apache.org/woden





Dan Diephouse <[email protected]> 
02/06/2006 11:05 AM
Please respond to
general


To
[email protected]
cc
[email protected], [email protected]
Subject
Re: XmlSchema/Axiom/Policy






I will see if I can get some tests whipped up this week. But, I would 
like to point out that this code has been tested. While not via unit 
tests, it is used in Axis, XFire, and other projects - which says 
something about its stability IMO. So I would be more in favor of doing 
a 1.0 and then a 1.1 later.

- Dan

Glen Daniels wrote:
> +1 for getting an XmlSchema release going.
>
> I'd like to see a few more test cases, ideally, before going out the
> door.  How about doing a beta cycle, so we have a little time to try to
> freshen up the tests and also to get some feedback from anyone
> interested before "really" going 1.0?  I'd propose releasing
> XmlSchema-1.0-beta-1 and giving people a little time (couple of weeks?)
> to wake up and try it out while we add a few more tests... Then we can
> do 1.0 proper after that.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> --Glen 
>
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Dan Diephouse [mailto:[email protected]] 
>> Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2006 12:23 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: XmlSchema/Axiom/Policy
>>
>> Haha... We *have* been bashing to code. I've submitted a 
>> couple patches and I know another XFire guy, Mika, has as 
>> well.  I would gladly do the release/announcements/etc if I 
>> had karma... *cough* Are there some non-karma things that I 
>> can do? I know there is one outstanding issue in JIRA, but I 
>> don't see much holding us back beyond that.
>>
>> - Dan
>>
>> Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
>> 
>>> On Sun, 2006-02-05 at 10:15 -0500, Dan Diephouse wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> Hi all,
>>>> Can we do some kind of release of the XmlSchema stuff? 1.0-M1? 
>>>> 1.0-beta-1? We could even call it 1.0 I suppose as its 
>>>> 
>> been around a 
>> 
>>>> while...
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> +1 for doing a 1.0 of XmlSchema. Dan, can we rope you into 
>>> 
>> help bash 
>> 
>>> +the
>>> release into shape? ;-)
>>>
>>> I assume next you're going to help get Axiom into 1.0 .. and then 
>>> Axis2? ;-) Ok ok now I'm jumping too far but let's start 
>>> 
>> with XmlSchema!
>> 
>>> Sanjiva.
>>>
>>>
>>> 
>>> 
>> --
>> Dan Diephouse
>> Envoi Solutions LLC
>> http://envoisolutions.com
>> http://netzooid.com/blog
>>
>>
>> 


-- 
Dan Diephouse
Envoi Solutions LLC
http://envoisolutions.com
http://netzooid.com/blog
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.