DOOM and SOAPEnvelope
"Paul Fremantle" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.axis.devel,gmane.text.xml.commons.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I recently found some parts of DOOM that weren't implemented (I got TODO exceptions). I believe these were in implementations of SOAPEnvelope/SOAPBody. I also had a problem where DOOM couldn't cope with an empty Namespace. Anyway, my point is this. Surely we shouldn't have two implementations of the SOAP* interfaces - one for DOOM and one for LLOM? Won't the code be exactly the same in both cases? If not, I'm sure we could refactor so it is. Paul -- Paul Fremantle Co-Founder and VP of Technical Sales, WSO2 OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair blog: http://pzf.fremantle.org [email protected] "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com