Re: [Axis2] Common VOTE for XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi

Davanum Srinivas <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.text.xml.axis.devel,gmane.text.xml.commons.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

John,

Which tests fail?

- -- dims

John Kaputin (gmail) wrote:
| With XmlSchema 1.4.1 we are seeing a regression in the Woden test results
| for the W3C WSDL 2.0 test suite. We see 4 test cases fail which passed
| successfully when Woden was last tested with XmlSchema 1.3.1.  It seems to
| be related to chameleon includes (including a schema that has no TNS). In
| 1.3.1, no target namespace was represented in the XmlSchema object by a
| null. In 1.4.1 no target namespace is represented by the empty string "".
| This change in the representation of a missing target namespace is causing
| the regression in Woden.  I think the 1.3.1 behaviour was correct.  I don't
| think a missing TNS should be represented as an empty string. Can any
| XmlSchema devs shed more light on this?
|
| thanks,
| John Kaputin.
|
| On 4/10/08, Eran Chinthaka <[email protected]> wrote:
|
|> +1 from me too.
|>
|> Thanks,
|> Eran
|>
|> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Glen Daniels <[email protected]>
|> wrote:
|>
|>> Hi dims:
|>>
|>> Davanum Srinivas wrote:
|>>
|>>> In the interest of time, i propose we make a joint vote for all 3
|>>> commons projects (XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi). Then woden
|>>> can pick up xmlschema/axiom and make their release. Then we cut Axis2
|>>> 1.4 FINAL.
|>>>
|>>> Sounds like a plan?
|>>>
|>> +1, sounds like a plan.  I'll grab the latest and kick some tires.
|>>
|>> --Glen
|>>
|>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
|>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
|>>
|>>
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin)

iD8DBQFIBLUqgNg6eWEDv1kRAtbDAJ93rhDBchyw8moPsz+Js6qR2pRCPACfTt9K
C0D/1bsFqHwlKCIiwRD1VY4=
=RF6F
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.