Re: Language design, orthogonality, paternalism, bad rules, and elephant traps
Dave Pawson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAEncD4cct5Gb9fm4xo4mmZZ0G6jYRLBBCbcu8DsbmEqC1APujw@mail.gmail.com> |
On Wed, 2 Mar 2022 at 14:39, Roger L Costello <[email protected]> wrote: > The answer is orthogonality. Michael Kay explains: > > “Orthogonality (or, "no needless restrictions") adjective Mathematics. Also orthographic. pertaining to or involving right angles or perpendiculars:an orthogonal projection. (of a system of real functions) defined so that the integral of the product of any two different functions is zero. (of a system of complex functions) defined so that the integral of the product of a function times the complex conjugate of any other function equals zero. (of two vectors) having an inner product equal to zero. (of a linear transformation) defined so that the length of a vector under the transformation equals the length of the original vector. (of a square matrix) defined so that its product with its transpose results in the identity matrix. Mike? -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. Docbook FAQ. _______________________________________________________________________ XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS to support XML implementation and development. To minimize spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting. [Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/ Or unsubscribe: [email protected] subscribe: [email protected] List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php