Many different syntaxes in XML - is that good language design?

Hi Folks,

There are many different syntaxes in XML:

The comment syntax:  <!-- ... -->

The PI syntax:  <? ... ?>

The CDATA section syntax:  <![CDATA[ ... ]>

The DOCTYPE syntax:  <!DOCTYPE ... >

The entity syntaxes:  &amp;  and &#x020; and &#032;

The namespace syntax:  xmlns:foo="..." and <foo:bar>...</foo:bar>

Attribute/value syntax:  x="blah"

The start-tag/end-tag syntax:

<baz>
   <widget>...</widget>
</baz>

Phew! That is a lot of different syntaxes.

Is that good language design to have so many different syntaxes?

Dealing with lots of different syntaxes is hard. For example, I never remember the syntax for CDATA sections (in fact, I had to look it up just now).

Isn't it better language design to have a small number of syntaxes?

/Roger

_______________________________________________________________________

XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.

[Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
Or unsubscribe: [email protected]
subscribe: [email protected]
List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php