Re: RE: The limits of XML mean the limits of my data world

Jim DeLaHunt <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.text.xml.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Dimitre:

On 2022-05-30 11:29, Dimitre Novatchev wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, May 29, 2022 at 11:13 PM Imsieke, Gerrit, le-tex 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>     You can express or represent (I regard both terms as synonymous
>     wrt the
>     current discussion) such an overlap in XML, see for example how the
>     Common Music Notation handles overlap in beams or slurs (search for
>     "overlap" on [1]). It's just that you cannot express it using
>     overlapping elements.
>
>     [1] https://music-encoding.org/guidelines/v4/content/cmn.html
>
>
> The fact is that no conductor in the world is using CMN, do they? :)

Quite the contrary. Almost all conductors use Common Music Notation, if 
they have a score at all. Because Common Music Notation is the term for 
'Just the "old-fashioned", non-xml-based musical scores ...'.

The link at [1] is to documentation of MEI (Music Encoding Initiative), 
an XML-based language for describing music scores in various notations, 
including Common Music Notation. (There are other notations for music 
scores, such tablatures for guitars, neumes for medieval chant, etc.)

I might re-word Gerrit's comment as "see for example how MEI handles the 
case when Common Music Notation beams or slurs overlap measure 
boundaries". It is interesting because MEI has a fundamental structure, 
the <measure> element, which corresponds to a CMN measure. CMN beams and 
slurs can cross measure boundaries. MEI has a way to represent the 
initial end of a beam or slur within one <measure> element, and final 
end of that beam or slur within a later <measure> element. I believe 
that is the "overlap" to which Gerrit was referring.

> If "XML is one's language" and they have to conduct an orchestra, what 
> are the chances they will use [MEI] and not the [CMN, i.e.] 
> "old-fashioned", non-xml-based musical scores ?
> Does even a single such example exist?

Of course not. For the same reason that I would rather read a novel as 
formatted text rather than XML-based DocBook[2] source representation of 
the novel. It is the old story of it being valuable to represent content 
in a markup language for authoring and workflow, and to render it into a 
different representation for human consumption.

[2] https://docbook.org/

Best regards,
      —Jim DeLaHunt

-- 
.   --Jim DeLaHunt,[email protected]      http://blog.jdlh.com/  (http://jdlh.com/)
       multilingual websites consultant

       2201-1000 Beach Ave, Vancouver BC V6E 4M2, Canada
          Canada mobile +1-604-376-8953
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.