Re: [xml-dev] What is the “standard f orm” of data?
Michael Kay <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> > I respectfully disagree. From the reading that I have done on the early days of UNIX, some very smart people developed some really good coding principles. From my perspective, those principles are timeless. For instance, does anyone disagree with this principle that they developed 50+ years ago: "A program should be viewed as just a stage in a larger process. Stages should be simple and easy to connect." > > In my opinion, an idea should be based on its merit, not its age. > Database technology, centred on the capabilities of large direct-access disks, emerged at about the same time as UNIX, and the initial design of UNIX failed to take account of it (the filestore permissions model, for example, is totally unsuited to database-centric applications). The UNIX concept of pipelines is a great way of organising batch jobs, but it really doesn't fit into the world of database-driven transaction processing, which is a completely different, and equally valid, paradigm. Michael Kay Saxonica _______________________________________________________________________ XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS to support XML implementation and development. To minimize spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting. [Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/ Or unsubscribe: [email protected] subscribe: [email protected] List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php