Re: It is okay for things to break in the future!
"Simon St.Laurent" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Maybe spend a while with Walter Perry, or at least his older posts? He was repeating "I Guess Everyone Else's Perspective" from the beginning here. Though not precisely that it's not possible to model the world so much as it's not possible to share models of the world. Thanks, Simon On 9/4/2022 6:11 PM, Roger L Costello wrote: > Damian provides an excellent summary of the two perspectives. > > Here is a slight revision of Damian's summary: > > Roger's Perspective: It is possible to know the current world. Developers can and should model the current world. The benefits of flagging data that violates the model outweighs the benefits of "coding for the future." > > I Guess Everyone Else's Perspective: It is not possible to model the world. Even in incredibly simple ways. The costs of breaking the model when the world doesn’t agree with the model outweighs the benefits of flagging invalid data. > > /Roger _______________________________________________________________________ XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS to support XML implementation and development. To minimize spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting. [Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/ Or unsubscribe: [email protected] subscribe: [email protected] List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php