Re: MinML: an experimental, more concise meta-syntax for XML and HTML
Norman Gray <[email protected]> Wed, 4 Jan 2023 16:38:05 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Bryan, Michael and all, hello. On 4 Jan 2023, at 10:20, Michael Kay wrote: > Thanks for sharing. This kind of project is great fun: I did something > similar with a group of students under the name FtanML - > > https://balisage.net/Proceedings/vol10/html/Kay01/BalisageVol10-Kay01.html I fully agree it's great fun, and my own contribution to the playpit is <https://nxg.me.uk/dist/lx/>, which is a syntax intended to look like the 'sexp' syntax that various Lisps use, which is parseable into a SAX stream (so the consumer of that stream doesn't have to know that it didn't originate in pointy brackets). When I was thinking about that, I was concerned with very markup-heavy 'texts' (such as XSLT), as opposed to the more traditional use-case (which I think MinML is aimed at?) where there is more text than markup. Also, I just find the homogeneity of sexps really pretty! > and it's not difficult to do a lot better than XML on many measures > (but beware the end tag problem: counting brackets in ">>>>>>>>>" gets > tedious). Indeed (though the ')))))' problem is a non-problem if you have anything resembling a lisp head on you, or if you're using a programmer's editor; I agree this isn't everyone). > The sad fact though is that standards like ASCII, the Qwerty keyboard, > and XML survive for centuries because the cost of change is higher > than the benefit. They might be displaced in particular areas, but > there needs to be a very strong incentive to change in an area where > the cost of breaking compatibility is not too high. That's a high > hurdle to get over. I think this is the big/deep/core point. I'd guess that lots of people have favourite ways that the XML syntax is Annoying, but it's a very 'engineer's' solution, which isn't pretty, but which is stable because it's being pulled in so many different directions at once. I suspect large chunks of the various constraints would have to change, before the solution space would change enough to make a radically different syntax something other than a minority taste. Best wishes, Norman -- Norman Gray : https://nxg.me.uk SUPA School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow, UK _______________________________________________________________________ XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS to support XML implementation and development. To minimize spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting. [Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/ Or unsubscribe: [email protected] subscribe: [email protected] List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php