Re: Bad Design? An XML Schema that forces applications to maintain state
Norm Tovey-Walsh <[email protected]> Tue, 07 Feb 2023 08:39:48 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Roger L Costello <[email protected]> writes: > In other words, the XML Schema forces applications to maintain state. > > Isn't that really, really bad? > > Imagine trying to map this battlefield message data format to some > other battlefield data format. You would have to do state-dependent > mapping. Ugh! That's awful! Right? Maybe. It really depends on the context. If this is a format used by historians to describe battles and the expectation is that entire campaigns will be in a single file then not forcing the user to repeat something is possibly a useful feature. The value you want is always on a preceding sibling anyway. Even in a modern context where the messages are being used to describe an ongoing conflict, if they’re routinely sent in small batches, it might be advantageous to save space by allowing later messages in the same batch have state implicit from earlier messages. If they’re being sent wholly independently over UDP then, yeah, that seems bad. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Tovey-Walsh <[email protected]> https://nwalsh.com/ > Our years, our debts, and our enemies are always more numerous than we > imagine.--Charles Nodier
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 227 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEARYKAB0WIQSEJUqRvjpp8yLt8uKDEiZHbwv9OwUCY+IPswAKCRCDEiZHbwv9 OwPwAP913Mfo6h4FZltk/2vXg8nU/FTDhWN9A2Ulyz4And9OMQEAsRAs/x0VhZby dM6jZudtnh58FIavUPWYnWegoJ+rvwA= =wXjn -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----