Re: RE: XML Turing test
Thomas Passin <[email protected]> Tue, 14 Feb 2023 14:41:38 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2/14/2023 9:56 AM, Roger L Costello wrote: > Hi Folks, > > An engineer mapped this XML form: > > <Document> > <Pencil_Manufacturer>______</Pencil_Manufacturer> > </Document> > > to this XML form: > > <Document> > <Umbrella_Manufacturer>______</Umbrella_Manufacturer> > </Document> > > That’s a bizarre mapping, right? > > Let’s not be so quick to judge. > > The allowable values of Pencil_Manufacturer are: Staedtler, Faber, and > Camlin. > > The allowable values of Umbrella_Manufacturer are: Totes, Pogessi, and > Dynateck. > > The engineer mapped the values as follows: > > Staedtler --> Totes > Faber --> Pogessi > Camlin --> Dynateck > > Question: Is that a correct mapping? Are the two forms equivalent? > > It seems preposterous to even consider the two forms as equivalent. > After all, how can a document containing data about pencil manufacturers > be equivalent to a document containing data about umbrella manufacturers? > > Possibly it’s not so preposterous. > > What does it mean for two forms to be equivalent? Certainly they are not > equivalent with regard to string comparison: > > “pencil-manufacterer” != “umbrella-manufacturer” > > How about semantic equivalence? Intuitively we all know that pencils are > not the same as umbrellas. > > And yet, the applications that process the two forms produce the same > output. In my example I said that both applications output 1, 2, 3, but > the output could be something far more complex, such as outputs that > control the flight of an aircraft. > > If this form: > > <Document> > <Pencil_Manufacturer>______</Pencil_Manufacturer> > </Document> > > and this form: > > <Document> > <Umbrella_Manufacturer>______</Umbrella_Manufacturer> > </Document> > > are input into an aircraft’s Flight Management System (FMS) and both > result in the aircraft flying the same way, are the two forms equivalent? > > From the perspective of how they influence the application (aircraft > FMS) they are the same. > > From the perspective of semantics they are different. > > From the perspective of syntax they are different. > > Conclusion: it doesn’t matter how you map one XML to another. If they > both elicit the same response in applications, then the mapping is > correct/equivalent. By definition. > > Do you agree? You keep mixing up names, strings, and semantics. Usually what matters is the relationship between names and their values. You seem to assume that your names carry a lot of meaning, but you don't say what that meaning is, nor the relationship between the names and string values. If I have an element in an XML document whose value is "north", and another - maybe in another document - whose value is "nord", do you imagine you can feed those strings into a flight controller as is? No, there must be some means to connect those values with a direction in a form that the controller can make use of. Who cares if they are called a "pencil" or an "umbrella" or a "direction"? It's the mapping to their meaning, the semantics, that matters. For that matter, from your examples we can't tell if e.g., "north" means "fly at 0 deg true direction", "fly at 0 deg magnetic direction", "fly to some destination that is currently to our north", "you are currently flying without turning at 0 deg true", or something else. So yes, if the relationships between the elements and values of two documents are the same, and if you have a mapping for each to the desired semantics of the consuming system, then fine, the two can be considered to be equivalent, *for that purpose*. Things aren't usually specified that completely, though. _______________________________________________________________________ XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS to support XML implementation and development. To minimize spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting. [Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/ Or unsubscribe: [email protected] subscribe: [email protected] List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php