Re: Please stop writing specifications that cannot be parsed/processed by software
Norm Tovey-Walsh <[email protected]> Mon, 05 Jun 2023 17:38:58 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Debbie Lapeyre <[email protected]> writes: > After working for 3 or 4 weeks, she would complain that the spec was > ambiguous and give up. (Note I'm not saying that the spec WAS > ambiguous, let's not start that religious war, just that it seemed so > to many of us. I don’t know about the text of 8879 per se, let alone the early drafts, but I give the SGML Handbook high marks as a reference. Back when my copy was well worn and dogeared, I don’t recall ever trying to resolve an issue and not finding a precise answer in there somewhere. I may have cursed *a lot* about how long it sometimes took to find, but looking back thirty years, they were always there. Be seeing you, norm -- Norm Tovey-Walsh <[email protected]> https://norm.tovey-walsh.com/ > Nothing hath an uglier look to us than reason, when it is not on our > own side.--Marquess of Halifax
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 227 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEARYKAB0WIQSEJUqRvjpp8yLt8uKDEiZHbwv9OwUCZH4QnwAKCRCDEiZHbwv9 OwMCAP9FnCrsBt+HYUjkOdDDQRp8PDlV2qTJXH1YY6Xrk1k21gEAy0K/iuFWjLO5 6GsYQe8jicyoynWHBgjO85o0NUHP3wM= =zBLU -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----