Re: Media types handling in WSDL 1.2

Jonathan, Philippe,

I have an action from the XMLP WG to follow up on the recent 
discussions regarding WSD support for attachments. Are you able to 
confirm that the WSD WG is going to tackle the description side of the 
MTOM (nee PASWA) work currently underway in the XMLP WG ?

Thanks for any information.
Marc.


On Friday, Sep 26, 2003, at 11:21 US/Eastern, Marc Hadley wrote:

>
> On Wednesday, Sep 17, 2003, at 14:33 US/Eastern, Philippe Le Hegaret 
> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 13:57, Marc Hadley wrote:
>>> Does the involvement of the ws-desc WG mean that the XMLP WG can skip
>>> working on the description oriented parts of PASWA ?
>>
>> I certainly don't want to do the work on the XMLP WG :)
>
> And similarly I don't want to do the work of the ws-desc WG ;-).
>
>> The reality is: the technical decisions of the WSD WG for embedding
>> media types in XML Schema will impact on the work done in the XMLP WG.
>> Since the reverse is true, both WGs need to be aware of their work and
>> make sure we coordinate on it and reach the same conclusions.
>>
> I agree and +1 Mark's comment[1] that I think we need a cross WG task 
> force of some kind.
>
> Marc.
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/mid/[email protected]
>
> --
> Marc Hadley <[email protected]>
> Web Technologies and Standards, Sun Microsystems.
>
>
--
Marc Hadley <[email protected]>
Web Technologies and Standards, Sun Microsystems.