Re: New XMLP Issue Relating to Canonical Forms

Elliotte Rusty Harold <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.text.xml.distributed
Message-ID <p06002003bbac5a477486@[192.168.254.4]>
At 4:53 PM -0400 10/9/03, [email protected] wrote:


>* The SOAP Rec is unambiguous, to be a SOAP binding you must preserve the
>Infoset, which means you must preserve the characters even if in
>non-canonical form (especially since SOAP doesn't even know about types!)
>If it's an integer, you must preserve leading zeros, and if it's
>base64Binary you must preserve whitespace, etc.
>

Given that SOAP already forbids the document type declaration, I 
don't think XML canonicalization would affect any of these things. 
XML canonicalization does not perform Unicode normalization on text, 
nor does it remove leading zeroes, trim white space, etc. I think the 
only part of the infoset canonicalization affects involves the 
document type declaration (canonicalization removes it) but SOAP 
doesn't allow that in the first place.
-- 

   Elliotte Rusty Harold
   [email protected]
   Processing XML with Java (Addison-Wesley, 2002)
   http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xmljava
   http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0201771861/cafeaulaitA
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.