Re: Media types handling in WSDL 1.2

Jonathan, Philippe,

You didn't respond to my previous note below. I've been asked by the 
XMLP WG to try once more to obtain an answer. If you don't respond 
within a week we'll assume your silence means that you do not intend to 
tackle the description side of MTOM in the WSD WG.

Regards,
Marc.

On Wednesday, Oct 8, 2003, at 16:37 US/Eastern, Marc Hadley wrote:

>
> Jonathan, Philippe,
>
> I have an action from the XMLP WG to follow up on the recent 
> discussions regarding WSD support for attachments. Are you able to 
> confirm that the WSD WG is going to tackle the description side of the 
> MTOM (nee PASWA) work currently underway in the XMLP WG ?
>
> Thanks for any information.
> Marc.
>
>
> On Friday, Sep 26, 2003, at 11:21 US/Eastern, Marc Hadley wrote:
>
>>
>> On Wednesday, Sep 17, 2003, at 14:33 US/Eastern, Philippe Le Hegaret 
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 13:57, Marc Hadley wrote:
>>>> Does the involvement of the ws-desc WG mean that the XMLP WG can 
>>>> skip
>>>> working on the description oriented parts of PASWA ?
>>>
>>> I certainly don't want to do the work on the XMLP WG :)
>>
>> And similarly I don't want to do the work of the ws-desc WG ;-).
>>
>>> The reality is: the technical decisions of the WSD WG for embedding
>>> media types in XML Schema will impact on the work done in the XMLP 
>>> WG.
>>> Since the reverse is true, both WGs need to be aware of their work 
>>> and
>>> make sure we coordinate on it and reach the same conclusions.
>>>
>> I agree and +1 Mark's comment[1] that I think we need a cross WG task 
>> force of some kind.
>>
>> Marc.
>>
>> [1] http://www.w3.org/mid/[email protected]
>>
>> --
>> Marc Hadley <[email protected]>
>> Web Technologies and Standards, Sun Microsystems.
>>
>>
> --
> Marc Hadley <[email protected]>
> Web Technologies and Standards, Sun Microsystems.
>
>
--
Marc Hadley <[email protected]>
Web Technologies and Standards, Sun Microsystems.