Re: Proposal for generic MTOM format

Mark Nottingham <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.text.xml.distributed
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Noah,

I can understand your concerns here as a matter of practice, but I 
wonder why it's necessary to embody them in the specification. There 
may be cases where getting things from the network are desirable, and I 
don't see any reason to preclude their use (whether or not that's a 
good idea for a particular application is another story, of course).

Regards,


On Monday, October 20, 2003, at 12:11  PM, [email protected] 
wrote:

> Anish Karamarkar writes:
>
>>> If we separate out section 3.2 as a part of
>>> the separate document which is not SOAP
>>> specific, isn't that the same as XInclude
>>> with parse="binary"?
>
> I don't think so.  My impression is that an XInclude can reference any 
> web
> resource, which is a quite weak contract packaging wise.  MTOM, as I
> understand it, says:  xbinc:Include must be replaced with the resource
> representation >>in the multipart MIME  stream in which the reference
> occurs<<.   In other words, I see the MTOM serialization (though not
> necessarily all embodiments of the abstract MTOM feature) as 
> specifically
> providing for data packaged together in a single stream.  Indeed, I 
> would
> argue that if we used generalized include in the MTOM serialization, it
> should be limited to representations carried in that serialization.  
> It is
> completely unacceptable to have to open a web connection to get these
> message parts.
>
> Perhaps this is a reason not to use generalized XInclude in MTOM?  In
> other words, if you really mean Web-scale XInclude, with the possible 
> need
> to open external connections, use generalized XInclude (if it gets to
> Rec.)  For local-only include use xbinc:Include?  I can see this either
> way, but I think its essential that we call out separately the case 
> where
> messages are self-contained.  Thanks!
>
> Noah
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> Noah Mendelsohn                              Voice: 1-617-693-4036
> IBM Corporation                                Fax: 1-617-693-8676
> One Rogers Street
> Cambridge, MA 02142
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.