Bad link in specs [was: SOAP 1.1 w3c Recommendation ??]
"Scott Nichol" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.distributed |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <028c01c3c5b8$361fbd90$6401a8c0@northgate> |
Please forgive me for barging in on this list. I am not sure to whom I should bring attention that the specs, namely the Primer (http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-part0/) and Messaging Framework (http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-part1/) contain the same bad link for SOAP 1.1. Both point the user to http://www.w3.org/TR/SOAP/, which *was* SOAP 1.1, but which is now the Messaging Framework. SOAP 1.1 can, in fact, be found at [1] below (which I found in an old post to this list by Martin Gudgin). Amusingly, the document at [2] below also has bad links for SOAP 1.1. Scott Nichol > If you have to work with SOAP 1.1 then the Note[1] you found IS the > latest spec. You might also take a look at the WS-I Basic Profile[2] > which clarifies some of the ambiguities in SOAP 1.1 ( amongst other > things ). > > Gudge > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/NOTE-SOAP-20000508/ > [2] > http://www.ws-i.org/Profiles/Basic/2003-06/BasicProfile-1.0-BdAD.html