RE: Propsed new issue: variability of encoding in Miffy

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Amelia A Lewis
> Sent: 14 January 2004 09:34
> To: Anish Karmarkar
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Propsed new issue: variability of encoding in Miffy
> 
<SNIP/>
> > If processors are indeed allowed to pad lines with extra 
> spaces, then 
> > I would have to agree with Noah that we must not allow 
> 7-bit and 8-bit 
> > value for cte field.
> 
> Shouldn't allow it for HTTP anyway; illegal according to 2616.

Amy,

Do you read 2616 as saying that CTE is illegal in HTTP, period? Or just
that it cannot appear as an HTTP header? I ask because the discussion
here is about CTE on individual parts of a multipart\related package.

Gudge