Re: Issue 455 resolution text
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.distributed |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
For the record, this was Anish's proposal and I forwarded it. We have agreed a different resolution at the F2F, and it does not use "none". I suspect you will find it acceptable, but I don't have the exact text here. Thanks. -------------------------------------- Noah Mendelsohn IBM Corporation One Rogers Street Cambridge, MA 02142 1-617-693-4036 -------------------------------------- Marc Hadley <[email protected]> Sent by: [email protected] 03/02/2004 09:04 AM To: [email protected] cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: Issue 455 resolution text On Mar 2, 2004, at 4:45 AM, [email protected] wrote: > > Issue resolution: > "If the sender wants a representation header to survive processing at > SOAP intermediaries (and reach the ultimate destination), it may use > the > SOAP role of 'http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope/role/none'. The > document that specifies the representation header will include text > that > specifies what a SOAP node must do when processing the representation > header with a role of > 'http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope/role/none'." > This seems quite wrong to me. Special casing the use of 'none' for the Representation header goes against the SOAP processing model - use of 'none' requests that the header block isn't processed by intermediaries. The Representation header should follow normal SOAP processing rules. I'm opposed to this resolution. Marc. --- Marc Hadley <marc.hadley at sun.com> Web Products, Technologies and Standards, Sun Microsystems.