Re: Issue 455 closed: Representation header and SOAP processing model

Jackek Kopecky writes:

> it seems to me that what you are describing is the
> default behavior - Representation header is removed by
> any node that processes it, except when the node knows
> better, e.g. by following the rules of our sticky role.

Were that true we wouldn't be having this discussion.  Jean-Jacques 
proposal says [1] 

* 2. The Representation header block MUST always be reinserted, even if 
processed.

Maybe I'm misunderstanding, but this seems to eliminate all latitude, and 
perhaps make the sticky role somewhat redundant.  This discussion is 
starting to feel a bit strange, which is often a signal that I am 
confused.  If so, my apologies for leading us astray.

Noah

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xmlp-comments/2004Mar/0024.html

--------------------------------------
Noah Mendelsohn 
IBM Corporation
One Rogers Street
Cambridge, MA 02142
1-617-693-4036
--------------------------------------