Re: Issue 455 closed: Representation header and SOAP processing model
Anish Karmarkar <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.distributed |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Yves Lafon wrote: > On Tue, 23 Mar 2004 [email protected] wrote: > > >>Also: I think the particular name "sticky" is a bit unfortunate. Would >>"reinsertRepresentation" have a slightly less pejorative connotation? > > > Just to note that the name "sticky" was meant to be changed if a better > alternative was found. > Actually the name "sticky" was never mentioned during the F2F. It was initially called 'anish-header' and later something like -- 'name to be decided later'. I came up with the name 'sticky' for the draft (didn't want it to be called Anish-header ;-) ). The inspiration for the header is the behavior of the Unix's sticky bit [1] on regular files where the program text portion is "sticky". I guess I should have called it "miffy-role" ;-) -Anish -- [1] http://www.faqs.org/faqs/hp/hpux-faq/section-70.html