RE: Describing which blobs are to be optimized.

"Ugo Corda" <[email protected]> Fri, 4 Jun 2004 17:38:52 -0700

Newsgroups	gmane.comp.web.services.description,gmane.text.xml.distributed
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

Yes, sorry. I meant base64Binary.
 
Ugo

	-----Original Message-----
	From: Prasad Yendluri [mailto:[email protected]] 
	Sent: Friday, June 04, 2004 5:29 PM
	To: Ugo Corda
	Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
	Subject: Re: Describing which blobs are to be optimized.
	
	
	Ugo,
	
	Did you  mean Base64Binary and not base64Decimal here?
	
	Regards, Prasad
	
	Ugo Corda wrote:
	

			Perhaps the right middle ground is to provide a
hook that designates 
			elements that are guaranteed to be in base64
canonical form, and that are 
			    

			suggested as optimization candidates?
			    

		
		Could that be achieved by defining a subtype of
base64Decimal that only
		allows canonical representations, and associating that
subtype in the
		WSDL with the element we care about?
		
		Ugo