RE: Proposal for solving XOP/MTOM rec issues

[inline]

Gudge 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Hervé Ruellan
> Sent: 14 September 2005 08:19
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Proposal for solving XOP/MTOM rec issues
> 
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> I've just check the current issues against XOP, MTOM and RSHB 
> recs. Here 
> are some draft proposal for resolving them.
> 
> 34rec
> -----
> "startinfo" parameter.
> 
> I found one occurence of "startinfo" instead of "start-info" 
> in XOP and 
> one in MTOM.
> 
> I think that in both cases these should be changed to "start-info".

+1

> 
> 35rec
> -----
> "action" parameter examples.
> 
> There are two examples in XOP where the "action" parameter value is a 
> relative URI.
> 
> I think that in both cases the value should be changed to an absolute 
> URI as specified in the SOAP spec.

+1 

> 
> Comment at [1]
> --------------
> Possible defect in XOP.
> 
> The commentator thinks that the language used to describe the 
> conditions 
> for an element information item to be optimized does not 
> specify clearly 
> that such an element information item must have only character 
> information items in its [children].
> 
> I think that the language used specify that the element 
> information item 
> must only have character information items in its [children]. 
> However, 
> this could be made explicit by adding a note in XOP 3.1 and 
> in MTOM 2.3.1.

I also believe the current language is sufficient. But I would not be averse to adding clarifying text.

> 
> Regards,
> 
> Hervé.
> 
> [1] 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xmlp-comments/2005Aug/0004.html
> 
> 
> 
>