Re: Response envelope optional vs. response optional
Mark Baker <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.distributed |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 12/21/05, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > I would disagree very strongly with talking about the subsequent delivery > of the SOAP Response in the cases where a 202/204 was returned. My view > is that, with this pattern, there is no obligation to do anything further > at all after the 202/204, at least not at the SOAP level. +1!! Mark. -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca Coactus; Web-inspired integration strategies http://www.coactus.com