Re: Rewrite of SOAP 1.2 Adjuncts
Rich Salz <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.distributed |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> >Do you htink it's legitimate for parts of the SOAP stack to turn a "no > >SOAP response" from the transport/transfer layer, into an empty soap > >message? > > > > > I've proposed it (it's "DH1" on the table I sent a while ago), but I'm > no longer so sure it's the best way to go. It seems to me that *not* doing it requires WSDL knowledge to be embedded pretty deeply into the SOAP stack or distributed among all intermediaries that may be involved in hte message. Either way, that seems like a bad idea. /r$ -- SOA Appliance Group IBM Application Integration Middleware * This address is going away; please use [email protected] *