FW: Updated Simple MEPs Part 2. (fwd)
Yves Lafon <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.distributed |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
(On behalf of Dave, content zipped to bypass the limit of the size of attachments) -- Yves Lafon - W3C "Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras." ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 21:24:19 +0000 From: David Orchard <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Subject: [Moderator Action (size limit exceeded)] FW: Updated Simple MEPs Part 2. Resending, W3C seems to have eaten this. Dave ________________________________ From: David Orchard Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 3:05 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Updated Simple MEPs Part 2. I've attached two different Simple MEP proposals. One is without the soap-response MEP and the other has the soap-response MEP in a very simple form. I've updated this proposal to use some of the wording that Noah suggested in his proposal in the HTTP Binding. Where I disagreed with his wording, I kept his wording to keep these synchronized and sent separate comments to the list. Cheers, Dave
docs.zip
(application/zip, 110.1 KB) - not displayed