RE: URI for the concept of SOAP MEP?

Mike Mahon writes:

> I'll put this on the next XMLP agenda and will let you know the 
> expected timeframe for resolution after that. 

Thank you, Mike.  You and the workgroup may be interested in the note that 
I posted this morning to the TAG list [1].  I suggest that all concerned 
take a look as input to our XMLP discussion.  Please also take a look at 
the most recent response from Tim Berners-Lee, in which he suggests that 
the representation of the new resource we create have the following 
characteristics [2]:

"The URI should be the URI of an RDF document # a local identifier. The 
RDF document should define basic information about the class, that it is a 
class, label, comment, etc. If the URI is being minted as part of the RDF 
mapping, then I don't see a reason from the document being in anything 
other than RDF." 

Taking my note and Tim's together, there's also a good chance that we 
might want to put RDF descriptions in place for the particular MEPs at 
[3,4].

Thank you.

Noah

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2006Jan/0065.html
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2006Jan/0066.html
[3] http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/request-response/ 
[4] http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/soap-response/ [3]

--------------------------------------
Noah Mendelsohn 
IBM Corporation
One Rogers Street
Cambridge, MA 02142
1-617-693-4036
--------------------------------------