Re: The deep difference between request/response andfire-and-forget
Jean-Jacques Moreau <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.distributed |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[email protected] wrote: >It's an interesting question whether one should bother naming two one way MEPs that differ only in the likelihood of delivery in the face of short-term network trouble. My inclination would be to define at most one FAF MEP and leave it as a quality of service of the binding what the likelyhood of delivery would be. > Or are you implicitly calling for a "qos" property on the MEP (assuming there's an API to find a transport based on a MEP property and there's an application/middleware with a little bit of intelligence and not all hardwired in WSDL, all such things having a faint probability to occur in practice)? JJ.