Re: Strongly agin the "strongly typed" meps

Hi Chris,

Could you elaborate on your WSDL-MEP thoughts? (although the "modern 
lexicon phrase" probably now also applies to WSDL)

Blog responses also accepted. ;-)

JJ.

Christopher B Ferris wrote:

>
> All,
>
> My comments on Dave's blog post are on my blog, here:
>
>         
> http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/dw_blog_comments.jspa?blog=440&entry=107924 
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Christopher Ferris
> STSM, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture
> email: [email protected]
> blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/dw_blog.jspa?blog=440
> phone: +1 508 377 9295
>
> [email protected] wrote on 02/14/2006 08:51:51 PM:
>
> > Strongly typed meps are like putting the cart before the horse.  
> > Looking at the message to figure out the mep to figure out what the
> > receiver should do is harder than looking at the message to figure
> > out what the receiver should do.  
> >  
> > A longer version is at
> > http://www.pacificspirit.
> > 
> com/blog/2006/02/13/message_exchange_patterns_and_flavours_of_oneway_messaging 
>
> >  
> > Cheers,
> > Dave